Sabel v. City and County of San Francisco, 16-cv-04832-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171215996
Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST TIMOTHY GOMES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER Docket No. 58. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . On November 29, the Court ordered Plaintiff Norman Sabel's former counsel, Mr. Timothy Gomes, to file a declaration by December 8 stating that he had produced all documents in his possession to Mr. Sabel in the following categories: • All communications between Mr. Gomes and Mr. Sabel • All communications between Mr
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST TIMOTHY GOMES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER Docket No. 58. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . On November 29, the Court ordered Plaintiff Norman Sabel's former counsel, Mr. Timothy Gomes, to file a declaration by December 8 stating that he had produced all documents in his possession to Mr. Sabel in the following categories: • All communications between Mr. Gomes and Mr. Sabel • All communications between Mr...
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MONETARY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST TIMOTHY GOMES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER
Docket No. 58.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
On November 29, the Court ordered Plaintiff Norman Sabel's former counsel, Mr. Timothy Gomes, to file a declaration by December 8 stating that he had produced all documents in his possession to Mr. Sabel in the following categories:
• All communications between Mr. Gomes and Mr. Sabel
• All communications between Mr. Gomes and Ms. Bers or Defendant's other counsel
• Any notes related to Mr. Gomes' preparation or research of this lawsuit, including attorney work-product
• The retainer agreement/contract between Mr. Gomes and Mr. Sabel
See Docket No. 58 at 2.
Mr. Gomes has not yet complied with the Court's order. Mr. Gomes is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why monetary sanctions should not be imposed against him for his failure to comply, in an amount including but not limited to incremental sanctions in the amount of $100.00 for each day he fails to file a compliant declaration after December 19, 2017. Mr. Gomes's response to this order to show cause is due no later than December 29, 2017.
The Court will serve a copy of this order on Mr. Gomes by mail to the Law Office of Timothy Gomes, 2225 East Bayshore Rd., Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA 94303. A copy will also be served to Mr. Gomes by e-mail at courthelp@comcast.net.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
