Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION v. BNP PARIBAS SECURITIES CORP., CV-10-4030-SI. (2010)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20101208d20 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 08, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2010
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge. WHEREAS on August 2, 2010, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco; WHEREAS on September 8, 2010, Defendants removed the case to this Court; WHEREAS on September 14, 2010, the parties submitted stipulations, which the Court thereafter approved, providing that Defendants would have until December 13, 2010 to ans
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

WHEREAS on August 2, 2010, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco;

WHEREAS on September 8, 2010, Defendants removed the case to this Court;

WHEREAS on September 14, 2010, the parties submitted stipulations, which the Court thereafter approved, providing that Defendants would have until December 13, 2010 to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS on October 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand this case to state court, which currently is scheduled to be heard on February 25, 2011;

WHEREAS the parties believe that in the interests of judicial efficiency and the orderly administration of the case, it makes sense for the Motion to Remand to be addressed before Defendants are required to respond to the Amended Complaint;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG THE PARTIES HERETO AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD THAT Defendants shall have until 30 days after entry of any order denying the Motion to Remand to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint, without prejudice to their right to seek adjournment or additional time from the Court in which to do so.

Respectfully submitted,

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer