LegalForce, Inc. v. LegalZoom.com, Inc., 18-cv-07274-MMC (RMI). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190819a40
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROBERT M. ILLMAN , Magistrate Judge . On August 6, 2019, the court held a discovery hearing regarding the parties' dispute over Defendant's request to use a two-tier protective order for material designated as Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only. See (dkt. 82). At the hearing, the parties reached an agreement with respect to a two-tier protective order. Consequently, the court ordered the parties "to submit the Joint Stipulated Protective Order within one week." See Text Or
Summary: ORDER ROBERT M. ILLMAN , Magistrate Judge . On August 6, 2019, the court held a discovery hearing regarding the parties' dispute over Defendant's request to use a two-tier protective order for material designated as Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only. See (dkt. 82). At the hearing, the parties reached an agreement with respect to a two-tier protective order. Consequently, the court ordered the parties "to submit the Joint Stipulated Protective Order within one week." See Text Ord..
More
ORDER
ROBERT M. ILLMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On August 6, 2019, the court held a discovery hearing regarding the parties' dispute over Defendant's request to use a two-tier protective order for material designated as Highly Confidential — Attorneys' Eyes Only. See (dkt. 82). At the hearing, the parties reached an agreement with respect to a two-tier protective order. Consequently, the court ordered the parties "to submit the Joint Stipulated Protective Order within one week." See Text Order, (dkt. 84). However, instead of submitting a joint stipulated protective order, the parties emailed the undersigned two competing versions of a proposed protective order.
Accordingly, the parties are hereby ordered to submit a joint letter brief no later than August 21, 2019 outlining both positions regarding the proposed protective order, and how those positions conform to the parties' agreement and to the court's guidance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
