Burley v. City and County of San Francisco, 16-cv-06762. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180302978
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Patricia Burley filed her complaint for damages October 18, 2015. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant City and County of San Francisco and Greg Suhr settled this matter on or about September 11, 2017. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Proc
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Patricia Burley filed her complaint for damages October 18, 2015. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant City and County of San Francisco and Greg Suhr settled this matter on or about September 11, 2017. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Proce..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Magistrate Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Patricia Burley filed her complaint for damages October 18, 2015.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant City and County of San Francisco and Greg Suhr settled this matter on or about September 11, 2017.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties further stipulate that the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees, expenses and costs.
Source: Leagle
