SPECTRA LICENSING GROUP, LLC v. MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., 16-cv-06093-RS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20161220b08
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively "Marvell") move, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, to extend their deadline to file a response to Plaintiff Spectra Licensing Group LLC's ("Spectra") First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on the ground that key Marvell personnel are on holiday vacation or otherwise unavailable between now and the current filing dea
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively "Marvell") move, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, to extend their deadline to file a response to Plaintiff Spectra Licensing Group LLC's ("Spectra") First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on the ground that key Marvell personnel are on holiday vacation or otherwise unavailable between now and the current filing dead..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Defendants Marvell Semiconductor Inc. and Marvell Technology Group LTD (collectively "Marvell") move, pursuant to Local Rule 6-3, to extend their deadline to file a response to Plaintiff Spectra Licensing Group LLC's ("Spectra") First Amended Complaint ("FAC") on the ground that key Marvell personnel are on holiday vacation or otherwise unavailable between now and the current filing deadline. Their response is currently due on December 20, 2016 and they request a limited extension until January 10, 2017. Good cause appearing, Marvell's request for a limited extension is hereby granted. Marvell must respond to Spectra's FAC by January 10, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
