ROBINSON v. OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING SAN FRANCISCO, LLC, 14-cv-00852-PJH. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170113a12
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES Re: Dkt. No. 126 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Before the court is a stipulation by the parties to extend the deadlines for fact discovery and expert discovery. Dkt. 126. The court declines to sign the order, and if a dispute arises, the only deadlines the court will enforce are those set by the court. While the parties may stipulate to extend the discovery deadlines if they wish, they are hereby advised that the deadline for dispositive motions
Summary: ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES Re: Dkt. No. 126 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . Before the court is a stipulation by the parties to extend the deadlines for fact discovery and expert discovery. Dkt. 126. The court declines to sign the order, and if a dispute arises, the only deadlines the court will enforce are those set by the court. While the parties may stipulate to extend the discovery deadlines if they wish, they are hereby advised that the deadline for dispositive motions ..
More
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DEADLINES
Re: Dkt. No. 126
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Before the court is a stipulation by the parties to extend the deadlines for fact discovery and expert discovery. Dkt. 126. The court declines to sign the order, and if a dispute arises, the only deadlines the court will enforce are those set by the court. While the parties may stipulate to extend the discovery deadlines if they wish, they are hereby advised that the deadline for dispositive motions to be heard remains May 3, 2017 per the court's prior orders. See Dkt. 102, 103.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
