Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Loftin v. County of Napa, 4:18-cv-01825-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190108809 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiff Clarence Loftin and Defendants Napa County, Daniel Lichau, Michael Milat, and James Kasper hereby stipulate that the action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(1)(A)(ii). All parties to bear their own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED.

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff Clarence Loftin and Defendants Napa County, Daniel Lichau, Michael Milat, and James Kasper hereby stipulate that the action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(1)(A)(ii). All parties to bear their own fees and costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer