Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ou-Young v. Stone, 19-cv-07000-BLF. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191106b20 Visitors: 28
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AND WHY THE PRE-FILING SCREENING ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE CLAIMS AGAINST FEDERAL JUDGES [Re: ECF 6] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . On October 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. See Notice of Removal Ex
More

ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE; AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AND WHY THE PRE-FILING SCREENING ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF SHOULD NOT BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE CLAIMS AGAINST FEDERAL JUDGES

[Re: ECF 6]

On October 17, 2019, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. See Notice of Removal Exh. 4 (Complaint), ECF 1. Plaintiff asserts a single claim for "Unreasonable Seizures" against Defendants Santa Clara County, Assessor Lawrence Stone, Senior Assessment Clerk Jeanette Tonini, and United States District Judge Edward J. Davila. See id. On October 25, 2019, the United States of America removed the action to federal district court on behalf of Defendant Judge Davila. See Notice of Removal, ECF 1. The removal was based on 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(3), providing for removal of state court actions asserted against "[a]ny officer of the courts of the United States, for or relating to any act under color of office or in the performance of his duties."

On October 28, 2019, the United States filed an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, seeking leave to appear as amicus curiae in this action and to file a memorandum of points and authorities supporting issuance of an Order to Show Cause why the action should not be dismissed as to Judge Davila on the basis of absolute judicial immunity and why the pre-filing screening order regarding Plaintiff should not be expanded to include claims against federal judges. See United States' Administrative Motion, ECF 6. The United States' administrative motion is GRANTED.

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and on or before November 19, 2019: (1) why this action should not be dismissed as to Judge Davila on the basis of absolute judicial immunity, and (2) why the pre-filing screening order regarding Plaintiff should not be expanded to include claims against federal judges.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer