MORRIS v. NANGALAMA, 2:12-cv-1202 MCE KJN P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150413620
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2015
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On March 16, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled "Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Sanctions and Judicial Intervention. . . ." (ECF No. 65.) However, in essence, plaintiff's motion is a motion to compel discovery responses. Accordingly, the parties are required to brief this motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 12 at 3:4-8.) IT I
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On March 16, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled "Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Sanctions and Judicial Intervention. . . ." (ECF No. 65.) However, in essence, plaintiff's motion is a motion to compel discovery responses. Accordingly, the parties are required to brief this motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 12 at 3:4-8.) IT IS..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 16, 2014, plaintiff filed a document styled "Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Sanctions and Judicial Intervention. . . ." (ECF No. 65.) However, in essence, plaintiff's motion is a motion to compel discovery responses. Accordingly, the parties are required to brief this motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). (ECF No. 12 at 3:4-8.)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days, defendants shall file an opposition, or statement of non-opposition, to plaintiff's March 16, 2015 motion; and seven days thereafter, plaintiff shall file a reply.
Source: Leagle
