JOHNSON v. IDBAL, CIV S-11-2756 KJM GGH. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120328a98
Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. A status conference was held before the undersigned on March 15, 2012. The parties consented to proceed before the undersigned; however, they have not filed their consent forms. Before a scheduling order may issue, the consent forms need to be filed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail consent forms to all parties concurrently with this order. 2. The parties shall file their consent forms within fourteen
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. A status conference was held before the undersigned on March 15, 2012. The parties consented to proceed before the undersigned; however, they have not filed their consent forms. Before a scheduling order may issue, the consent forms need to be filed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail consent forms to all parties concurrently with this order. 2. The parties shall file their consent forms within fourteen (..
More
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.
A status conference was held before the undersigned on March 15, 2012. The parties consented to proceed before the undersigned; however, they have not filed their consent forms. Before a scheduling order may issue, the consent forms need to be filed.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail consent forms to all parties concurrently with this order.
2. The parties shall file their consent forms within fourteen (14) days of this order, after which a scheduling order shall issue.
Source: Leagle
