Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. KRAMER, C13-710 CRB. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160902a76 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The government has moved to stay this proceeding. See Motion (dkt. 36). After consideration of the parties' submissions and the relevant authorities, and in light of the Ninth Circuit's actions in Jacob and Gardner, the Court DENIES the motion. See Jacob v. United States, No. 15-73302, Dkt. 36 (9th Cir. June 27, 2016); Gardner v. United States, No. 15-72559, Dkt. 39 (9th Cir. June 27, 2016).
More

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The government has moved to stay this proceeding. See Motion (dkt. 36). After consideration of the parties' submissions and the relevant authorities, and in light of the Ninth Circuit's actions in Jacob and Gardner, the Court DENIES the motion. See Jacob v. United States, No. 15-73302, Dkt. 36 (9th Cir. June 27, 2016); Gardner v. United States, No. 15-72559, Dkt. 39 (9th Cir. June 27, 2016).

The government is ORDERED to show cause why Kramer's § 2255 petition should not be granted. The government is ORDERED to respond within 60 days after entry of this Order. Kramer shall file a reply brief not later than 30 days after the government's response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer