Gray v. Shulkin, 17-cv-03973-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180730a77
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND FACT DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 55 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Having reviewed Defendant's June 22, 2018 motion, Dkt. No. 55, and understanding that Plaintiff has agreed to Defendant's request for an additional deposition of Plaintiff, see Dkt. No. 61, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's request to extend the fact discovery cutoff for the sole purpose of completing a one-hour deposition of Plaintiff on the subject of her claim fo
Summary: ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND FACT DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 55 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Having reviewed Defendant's June 22, 2018 motion, Dkt. No. 55, and understanding that Plaintiff has agreed to Defendant's request for an additional deposition of Plaintiff, see Dkt. No. 61, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's request to extend the fact discovery cutoff for the sole purpose of completing a one-hour deposition of Plaintiff on the subject of her claim for..
More
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND FACT DISCOVERY Re: Dkt. No. 55
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Having reviewed Defendant's June 22, 2018 motion, Dkt. No. 55, and understanding that Plaintiff has agreed to Defendant's request for an additional deposition of Plaintiff, see Dkt. No. 61, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's request to extend the fact discovery cutoff for the sole purpose of completing a one-hour deposition of Plaintiff on the subject of her claim for emotional distress damages. Defendant will take the deposition within sixty days from the previous June 22, 2018 deadline. All other previously-ordered deadlines remain in place.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
