Filed: May 29, 2014
Latest Update: May 29, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Sonoma Valley Bank (FDIC-R") filed its Complaint in this action on August 19, 2013; WHEREAS Defendant Melvin J. Switzer filed a Motion to Dismiss in response to the Complaint; WHEREAS the Court entered an order denying the Motion to Dismiss on April 9, 2014 and ordered that Defendants file an answer to the com
Summary: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. WHEREAS Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Sonoma Valley Bank (FDIC-R") filed its Complaint in this action on August 19, 2013; WHEREAS Defendant Melvin J. Switzer filed a Motion to Dismiss in response to the Complaint; WHEREAS the Court entered an order denying the Motion to Dismiss on April 9, 2014 and ordered that Defendants file an answer to the comp..
More
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Sonoma Valley Bank (FDIC-R") filed its Complaint in this action on August 19, 2013;
WHEREAS Defendant Melvin J. Switzer filed a Motion to Dismiss in response to the Complaint;
WHEREAS the Court entered an order denying the Motion to Dismiss on April 9, 2014 and ordered that Defendants file an answer to the complaint within 20 days of the date of the Court's order (Dkt. 46);
WHEREAS the Court previously extended the deadline for Defendant Switzer's answer to the Complaint to May 29, 2014 (Dkt. 66); and
WHEREAS Defendant Switzer currently is recovering from a medical procedure and is in need of extra time to file an answer to the Complaint;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiff FDIC-R, on the one hand, and the Defendant Switzer, on the other hand, as follows:
Defendant Switzer's deadline to answer the Complaint will be extended 30 days to June 30, 2014.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories thereto.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
