Ratliff v. Vailes, 6:16-cv-6069. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180604550
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed May 5, 2018, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 28). Judge Marschewski recommends that Plaintiff William Anson Ratliff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 26) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show sufficient reason to reopen this case. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed May 5, 2018, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 28). Judge Marschewski recommends that Plaintiff William Anson Ratliff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 26) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show sufficient reason to reopen this case. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed May 5, 2018, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 28). Judge Marschewski recommends that Plaintiff William Anson Ratliff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 26) be denied because Plaintiff has failed to show sufficient reason to reopen this case.
Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 28) in toto. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 26) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
