Oakley v. Faneuil, Inc., 2:19-cv-00362-TLN-CKD. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190517a35
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 16, 2019
Latest Update: May 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (L.R. 144(d)) TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby extended by 14 days, from May 7, 2019 until May 21, 2019; 2. The deadline for the parties to confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) is continued
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (L.R. 144(d)) TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby extended by 14 days, from May 7, 2019 until May 21, 2019; 2. The deadline for the parties to confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) is continued t..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE (L.R. 144(d))
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby extended by 14 days, from May 7, 2019 until May 21, 2019;
2. The deadline for the parties to confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) is continued to from May 14 to May 29, 2019;
Source: Leagle
