Filed: Jan. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties in the above-captioned consolidated cases, through undersigned counsel, submit this stipulation regarding a briefing schedule and hearing date for an anticipated motion to be filed by the San Francisco Police Department (hereinafter "SFPD"). On December 14, 2016, the Court issued an order authorizing Rule 17 subpoenas issued to the SFPD, as requested
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . The parties in the above-captioned consolidated cases, through undersigned counsel, submit this stipulation regarding a briefing schedule and hearing date for an anticipated motion to be filed by the San Francisco Police Department (hereinafter "SFPD"). On December 14, 2016, the Court issued an order authorizing Rule 17 subpoenas issued to the SFPD, as requested ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The parties in the above-captioned consolidated cases, through undersigned counsel, submit this stipulation regarding a briefing schedule and hearing date for an anticipated motion to be filed by the San Francisco Police Department (hereinafter "SFPD").
On December 14, 2016, the Court issued an order authorizing Rule 17 subpoenas issued to the SFPD, as requested by the Defendants. Those subpoenas required production of documents subject to those subpoenas by January 25, 2017. The parties have continued to meet and confer regarding discovery for the documents subject to the subpoenas as well as documents that have been requested by the Defendants, but for which a subpoena has not yet been issued. One category of documents not yet subject to an issued subpoena is a request from the Defendants for approximately 1,000 SFPD incident reports. The Defendant intends to request that the Court authorize this subpoena shortly.
SFPD intends to file a motion for relief from the discovery order and/or a motion to quash. The parties stipulate and agree that the filing by the SFPD will address subpoenas issued on December 14, 2016 as well as the Defendants' anticipated subpoena for SFPD incident reports.
The parties stipulate and agree that SFPD will file its motion by January 27, 2017. The Defendants will file any response on or before February 10, 2017. The SFPD will file a reply on or before February 17, 2017. The parties jointly request that the motion be heard on March 1, 2017, at 3:00 p.m., subject to the Court's availability, or a date convenient to the Court.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Based on the stipulation of the parties, as set forth above, the briefing schedule for SFPD's motion for relief from the discovery order and/or a motion to quash is as follows: SFPD will file its motion by January 27, 2017; the Defendants will file any response on or before February 10, 2017; the SFPD will file any reply on or before February 17, 2017. The motion will be heard on March 1, 2017, at 3:00 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
