Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION v. MONEY MARKET 1 INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT DEALER, C 09 03529 JSW. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20120130964 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Plaintiff Louisiana Pacific Corporation ("LP") and Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("DBSI"), acting through their respective counsel, enter into the below stipulation: WHEREAS, the Court, on January 5, 2012, ordered the parties to submit a stipulation and proposed order selecting either private mediation or court mediation; WHEREAS, LP and DBSI met and conferred regarding mediation and agreed
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MEDIATION

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Louisiana Pacific Corporation ("LP") and Defendant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("DBSI"), acting through their respective counsel, enter into the below stipulation:

WHEREAS, the Court, on January 5, 2012, ordered the parties to submit a stipulation and proposed order selecting either private mediation or court mediation;

WHEREAS, LP and DBSI met and conferred regarding mediation and agreed upon private mediation;1

WHEREAS, the Court, on January 5, 2012, ordered the parties to complete the first round of mediation by April 4, 2012;

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between LP and DBSI, acting through their respective counsel, subject to this Court's approval, that LP and DBSI shall participate in private mediation, the first round of which shall be completed by April 4, 2012.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendant Money Market 1 Institutional Investment Dealer ("MM1") has declined to meet and confer with LP and DBSI regarding mediation and to join this stipulation. MM1 maintains that this matter remains stayed as against MM1, including all discovery and other proceedings, pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act until resolution of its motion to dismiss, which is pending before Judge Preska in the Southern District of New York in case numbers 1:09-MD-02030-LAP and 1:09-CV-09887-LAP.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer