Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Estate of Alderman v. City of Bakersfield, 1:16-CV-00994-DAD-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190304580 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER CLOSING THE CASE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the above-referenced matter be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. ORDER The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side bearing their own costs. (Doc. 92)
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER CLOSING THE CASE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the above-referenced matter be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.

ORDER

The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side bearing their own costs. (Doc. 92) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the stipulation (Doc. 92), it "automatically terminate[d] the action." Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer