Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hashimi, 2:17-cr-86 GEB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180629d07 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Brian A. Fogerty, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Douglas J. Beevers, attorneys for Abdul Hashimi, stipulate that the status conference scheduled for June 29, 2018, at 9:00 a.m., be vacated a
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Brian A. Fogerty, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Douglas J. Beevers, attorneys for Abdul Hashimi, stipulate that the status conference scheduled for June 29, 2018, at 9:00 a.m., be vacated and the matter continued to August 3, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. for a status conference.

Defense counsel requires additional time to conduct further investigation regarding potential mitigation, to engage in legal research, and to consult with the client regarding a possible resolution of this matter.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including August 3, 2018; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including August 3, 2018, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the June 29, 2018 status conference shall be continued until August 3, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer