BURNETT v. U.S., EDCV 15-1707-CAS (KKx). (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160826a23
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Codes, section 636, the Court has reviewed Defendant's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c), the relevant records on file, the original Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Final Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in de novo review
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , District Judge . Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Codes, section 636, the Court has reviewed Defendant's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c), the relevant records on file, the original Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Final Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in de novo review o..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge.
Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Codes, section 636, the Court has reviewed Defendant's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c), the relevant records on file, the original Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Final Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Defendant has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
