PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C. v. ECHOSTAR CORP., 2:08-CV-70-RSP. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20140813e06
Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2014
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge. Before the Court are PMC's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment and on Certain Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 396), and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 419) recommending that the motion be granted. Having considered the objections filed by Defendants Echostar Corp. and Dish Network Corp. (Dkt. Nos. 421 and 425) and by Defendants Rovi Guides, Inc. and TVG, Inc. (Dkt. Nos. 420 and 426), and having condu
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge. Before the Court are PMC's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment and on Certain Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 396), and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 419) recommending that the motion be granted. Having considered the objections filed by Defendants Echostar Corp. and Dish Network Corp. (Dkt. Nos. 421 and 425) and by Defendants Rovi Guides, Inc. and TVG, Inc. (Dkt. Nos. 420 and 426), and having conduc..
More
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
Before the Court are PMC's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment and on Certain Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 396), and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 419) recommending that the motion be granted. Having considered the objections filed by Defendants Echostar Corp. and Dish Network Corp. (Dkt. Nos. 421 and 425) and by Defendants Rovi Guides, Inc. and TVG, Inc. (Dkt. Nos. 420 and 426), and having conducted a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation as to which objection was made, and finding no error therein, the Court does hereby adopt the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Claim for Declaratory Judgment and on Certain Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 396) is GRANTED, the declaratory judgment requested in Count VI of PMC's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 374) is GRANTED, Counterclaim Counts Four and Five of the Echostar Defendants' Answer to PMC's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 382) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and all remaining claims by or against Rovi/TVG (Dkt. 384) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
