Filed: May 10, 2018
Latest Update: May 10, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES BY SIXTY DAYS; [PROPOSED] ORDER (L.R. 6-2) JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Devin Cole ("Cole") and defendant Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc. ("SPMC") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court grant sixty-day continuance of all currently scheduled deadlines, including deadline for SPMC's response to the Complaint. The parties declare in support of thi
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES BY SIXTY DAYS; [PROPOSED] ORDER (L.R. 6-2) JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Devin Cole ("Cole") and defendant Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc. ("SPMC") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court grant sixty-day continuance of all currently scheduled deadlines, including deadline for SPMC's response to the Complaint. The parties declare in support of this..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES BY SIXTY DAYS; [PROPOSED] ORDER (L.R. 6-2)
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-2, plaintiff Devin Cole ("Cole") and defendant Sierra Pacific Mortgage Company, Inc. ("SPMC") hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court grant sixty-day continuance of all currently scheduled deadlines, including deadline for SPMC's response to the Complaint. The parties declare in support of this request:
WHEREAS, Cole filed the instant action on March 19, 2018;
WHEREAS, SPMC must currently respond to the Complaint by May 11, 2018;
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2018, the Court entered its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR deadlines (ECF 5) and setting the Initial Case Management Conference for June 22, 2018;
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to engage in an informal exchange of information in an effort to settle this action early;
WHEREAS, the parties jointly desire to avoid further expenditure of the Court's resources or their resources on this litigation given the significant possibility that the case will be voluntarily dismissed without further burden on the Court;
WHEREAS, there has only been one prior time modification in this case; and
WHEREAS, in light of the above and in order to facilitate the settlement discussions, the parties jointly stipulate to and respectfully request this Court grant an approximate sixty-day continuance of all currently scheduled deadlines, including the response to the Complaint, and for the dates to be set as follows:
Deadline New Deadline
Response to Complaint 5/11/2018 7/10/2018
Last Day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early 6/1/2018 7/31/2018
settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan
Last Day to file ADR Certification signed by Parties and 6/1/2018 7/31/2018
Counsel
Last Day file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice 6/1/2018 7/31/2018
of Need for ADR Phone Conference
Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial
disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file 6/15/2018 8/14/2018
Case Management Statement per Standing Order re
Contents of Joint Case Management Statement
Initial Case Management Conference (CMC) at 2:00 PM 6/22/2018 8/24/2018
SO STIPULATED.
N.D. Cal. Rule 5-1(i)(3) ATTESTATION
In compliance with Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Kay Fitz-Patrick, hereby attest that David W. Martin has concurred in this filing.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
