Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Olins, CV 07-6423 MMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20140708775 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge. On June 30, 2014, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Notice of Motion, Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Olins Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court. The hearing on the motion is currently scheduled for August 8, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. After receiving the motion via the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case File Sy
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE RESCHEDULING HEARING ON MOTION

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

On June 30, 2014, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Notice of Motion, Motion and Brief in Support of Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Olins Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court. The hearing on the motion is currently scheduled for August 8, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.

After receiving the motion via the Court's Case Management/Electronic Case File System, on July 3, 2014, counsel for defendant Robert Olins contacted Plaintiff's counsel. The motion was a surprise to defendant Olins as he had been participating in the liquidation of assets by a receiver through the judgment filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (1:11-mc-00261-P1). The parties discussed some of the matters contained in the Motion, but agreed to allow defense counsel to research the matters contained in the Motion and to meet and confer regarding those matters. The parties agreed that a short continuance of the hearing on the Motion was in order to allow the parties to have meaningful discussions.

On July 3, 2014, defense counsel also contacted the Court's Courtroom Deputy who indicated that the Court was available to hear the motion on the parties' selected date of September 26, 2014, at 1:00 p.m.

Defense counsel, located in the Northern District of California, who will appear at the hearing on this Motion is also out of the district between July 26 and August 20, 2014, and would be unavailable to appear at the August 8, 2014 hearing date.

As such, to allow for a meaningful meet and confer and due to counsel's unavailability, the parties stipulate and request that the Court vacate the hearing date of August 8, 2014, and continue the hearing to September 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. The parties further stipulate and request that Defendant will file any opposition to the Motion on or before August 26, 2014. Plaintiff will file any reply on or before September 3, 2014.

SO STIPULATED:

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and per the parties' stipulation, the hearing for Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Robert Olins Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court is hereby continued until September 26, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Defendant will file any opposition to the Motion on or before August 26, 2014. Plaintiff will file any reply on or before September 3, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer