Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MIGHACCIO v. HATFIELD PORTFOLIO GROUP, LLC, 1:17-cv-00687-LJO-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170907b14 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE AS TO ACCELERATED SERVICING GROUP, LLC (Doc. 14) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 5, 2017, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to Accelerated Servicing Group, LLC. (Doc. 14) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(
More

ORDER CLOSING CASE AS TO ACCELERATED SERVICING GROUP, LLC

(Doc. 14)

On September 5, 2017, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal as to Accelerated Servicing Group, LLC. (Doc. 14) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to Accelerated Servicing Group, LLC only in light of the notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer