Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

THOMAS v. GUFFEY, 2:14-cv-0066 JAM KJN P. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141009871 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On September 15, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file the documents necessary for service of defendant Yang. On September 22, 2014, plaintiff submitted these documents. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff has also filed a motion to modify the scheduling order. In this motion, plaintiff requests that the scheduling order be modified so that he is granted sufficient tim
More

ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

On September 15, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file the documents necessary for service of defendant Yang. On September 22, 2014, plaintiff submitted these documents. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is denied as unnecessary.

Plaintiff has also filed a motion to modify the scheduling order. In this motion, plaintiff requests that the scheduling order be modified so that he is granted sufficient time to serve defendant Yang with discovery once defendant Yang appears in this action.

Plaintiff's motion is premature. Plaintiff may resubmit his motion to modify the scheduling order once defendant Yang appears in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's September 15, 2014 motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 30) is denied as unnecessary;

2. Plaintiff's September 11, 2014 motion to modify the scheduling order (ECF No. 28) is denied without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer