Medrano v. Party City Corporation, 2:16-cv-02996-WBS-EFB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170331j71
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION BY PARTIES TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES; [PROPOSED ORDER] WILLIAM B. SHUBB , Senior District Judge . Defendant PARTY CITY CORPORATION ("Defendant") and Plaintiffs ANTHONY MEDRANO and NICOLA GALASSI ("Plaintiffs") (jointly, the "Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows and mutually request that the Court approve and enter the proposed Order in accordance with this Stipulation. STIPULATION 1. The Part
Summary: STIPULATION BY PARTIES TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES; [PROPOSED ORDER] WILLIAM B. SHUBB , Senior District Judge . Defendant PARTY CITY CORPORATION ("Defendant") and Plaintiffs ANTHONY MEDRANO and NICOLA GALASSI ("Plaintiffs") (jointly, the "Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows and mutually request that the Court approve and enter the proposed Order in accordance with this Stipulation. STIPULATION 1. The Parti..
More
STIPULATION BY PARTIES TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES; [PROPOSED ORDER]
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, Senior District Judge.
Defendant PARTY CITY CORPORATION ("Defendant") and Plaintiffs ANTHONY MEDRANO and NICOLA GALASSI ("Plaintiffs") (jointly, the "Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows and mutually request that the Court approve and enter the proposed Order in accordance with this Stipulation.
STIPULATION
1. The Parties hereby agree to extend the deadline for Rule 26 initial disclosures to May 1, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the Court orders that the deadline for the Parties to make their Rule 26 initial disclosures is extended to May 1, 2017.
Source: Leagle
