Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE GOOGLE INC., ANDROID CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION, 11 2264 JSW (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130520e14 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 16, 2013
Latest Update: May 16, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. The parties in the above-entitled actions, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to the following: WHEREAS, at the September 23, 2011 initial case management conference in the Android and Yuncker actions, the Court explained that it would schedule a further case management conference in its "first substantive order" and if, at that time, the parties had "not
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

The parties in the above-entitled actions, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to the following:

WHEREAS, at the September 23, 2011 initial case management conference in the Android and Yuncker actions, the Court explained that it would schedule a further case management conference in its "first substantive order" and if, at that time, the parties had "nothing to report" they may submit a stipulation so stating (Android Dkt No. 18 at 15:24-16:5);

WHEREAS, in conjunction with its March 26, 2013 Orders in both the Android and Yuncker actions, the Court scheduled a further case management conference for May 31, 2013;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs in both the Android and Yuncker actions filed Second Amended Class Action Complaints ("SAC"s) on May 9, 2013, Google and Pandora are currently preparing Motions to Dismiss the SACs filed in their respective actions, there has been no other activity in either case since the Court issued its March 26, 2013 Orders, and the parties have nothing further to report;

WHEREAS, the counsel for Google, Pandora, and the Android and Yuncker plaintiffs have met and conferred, and agree that the case management conference for both actions should be continued until thirty days after the Court rules on the forthcoming Motions to Dismiss in both actions, if the Court deems that such a conference is still necessary at that time;

IT IS SO AGREED that:

The case management conference currently scheduled for May 31, 2013 in the Android and Yuncker actions is continued until thirty days after the Court rules on the forthcoming Motions to Dismiss in both actions, if the Court deems that such a conference is still necessary at that time.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The case management conferences scheduled for May 31, 2013, are VACATED andshall be reset by further order of the Court after the motions to dismiss are resolved.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer