Miller v. Navient Solutions, LLC, 2:19-cv-1701 MCE KJN (PS) (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200206855
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2020
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On October 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States , 602 F.2d 207 , 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclu
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . On October 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States , 602 F.2d 207 , 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclus..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
On October 31, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10) are ADOPTED;
2. The actions in No. 2:19-cv-1701 MCE KJN (PS); No. 2:19-cv-1702 MCE KJN (PS); and No. 2:19-cv-1708 MCE KJN (PS) are dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close these cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
