U.S. v. EDF Resource Capital, Inc., 2:13-cv-1158 JAM EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180619716
Visitors: 37
Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF PENDING MOTIONS AND REQUIRING A FURTHER STATUS REPORT BE FILED BY JUNE 29, 2018 IF A STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL HAS NOT BEEN FILED JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Upon review of the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that: 1. That stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 115), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF PENDING MOTIONS AND REQUIRING A FURTHER STATUS REPORT BE FILED BY JUNE 29, 2018 IF A STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL HAS NOT BEEN FILED JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Upon review of the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that: 1. That stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 115), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be r..
More
ORDER CONTINUING STAY OF PENDING MOTIONS AND REQUIRING A FURTHER STATUS REPORT BE FILED BY JUNE 29, 2018 IF A STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL HAS NOT BEEN FILED
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Upon review of the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing, it is ordered that:
1. That stay of all actions on any pending motions is continued (ECF 115), including the Motion to Intervene by Frank Dinsmore (ECF 68) and the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims by the United States (ECF 90), which can be re-noticed if a scheduling order is subsequently needed; and
2. A further status report shall be provided to the Court by June 29, 2018 if a dismissal has not been filed by that time.
It is so ORDERED
Source: Leagle
