Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Flores v. Minten, 18-cv-07329-SVK. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191206b54 Visitors: 29
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 36 SUSAN VAN KEULEN , Magistrate Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Amend Complaint (Dkt. 34) and Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement (Dkt. 36). The Parties have stipulated to add CITY OF SAN JOSE as a Defendant and to dismiss Defendants MARK MINTEN, individually and as an officer of the San Jose Police Department; TYLER MORAN, individually and as an officer of the San Jose Police
More

ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 36

The Court is in receipt of the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Amend Complaint (Dkt. 34) and Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement (Dkt. 36). The Parties have stipulated to add CITY OF SAN JOSE as a Defendant and to dismiss Defendants MARK MINTEN, individually and as an officer of the San Jose Police Department; TYLER MORAN, individually and as an officer of the San Jose Police Department; and CHRISTINA NICOLE JIZE, individually and as an officer of the San Jose Police Department, with prejudice.

Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 10-1, "[a]ny party filing or moving to file an amended pleading must reproduce the entire proposed pleading and may not incorporate any part of a prior pleading by reference." As the Parties' Joint Stipulation does not reproduce the original Complaint, the Court directs Plaintiff to file an amended complaint in accordance with Civ. L.R. 10-1 and the joint stipulation.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer