Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Dairy Solutions International, Limited v. Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC, 1:18-cv-00439-LJO-SKO. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180627813 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Dairy Solutions International, Limited and Defendant Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC dba Organic Pastures Dairy, by and through their respective counsel of record, that: WHEREAS, this action was commenced on or about March 30, 2018. (Doc. 1; Doc. 3). WHEREAS, on March 30, 2018, the Court entered an order setting a Mandatory Schedulin
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Dairy Solutions International, Limited and Defendant Organic Pastures Dairy Company, LLC dba Organic Pastures Dairy, by and through their respective counsel of record, that:

WHEREAS, this action was commenced on or about March 30, 2018. (Doc. 1; Doc. 3).

WHEREAS, on March 30, 2018, the Court entered an order setting a Mandatory Scheduling Conference for July 12, 2018 at 9:30 A.M. (Doc. 2).

WHEREAS, the clerk of the Court entered default against Defendant on June 1, 2018. (Doc. 6).

WHEREAS, on June 15, 2018, the Parties stipulated to have the entry of default set aside. (Doc. 7).

WHEREAS, on June 19, 2018, the Court entered an order setting aside and vacating the default entered against Defendant. (Doc. 8).

WHEREAS, Defendant's answer to Plaintiff's complaint is due July 3, 2018, and Defendant is still investigating the facts and circumstances giving rise to Plaintiff's claims.

WHEREAS, the Parties are unable to conduct and conclude a conference for the purposes of the Joint Scheduling Report, at least twenty (20) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference.

WHEREAS, there have been no other modifications of time in this matter.

WHEREAS, between June 19 and June 22, 2018, counsel for the Parties met and conferred concerning a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, and agreed to the following stipulation.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective counsel of record, pursuant to L.R. 143, therefore stipulate and agree, and, pursuant to L.R. 144, hereby request that:

(1) The Mandatory Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled for July 12, 2018 at 9:30 A.M., be continued to August 23, 2018 at 9:45 A.M.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I, Stephanie M. Rocha, hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from each of the other signatories whose signatures are indicated by a conformed signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the parties' "Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference" (Doc. 14), and for good cause shown, hereby ORDERS that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference set for July 12, 2018 is CONTINUED to August 23, 2018 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days before the Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer