FOUCHÉ v. HOLENCIK, ED CV 10-0087-MMM (PJW). (2012)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20120529570
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 24, 2012
Latest Update: May 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Ju
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Jud..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, with the exception that it corrects a typographical error on page 8, line 6. The first word on that line should be "unconstitutional," not "constitutional."
Source: Leagle
