CENTRIX FINANCIAL, LLC v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, 09-cv-01542-PAB-CBS. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20150605998
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Objections to Defendants' Counter-Designations to Plaintiffs' Counter-Designations for Robert Sutton and Roland Anderson filed by plaintiffs Centrix Financial Liquidating Trust and Jeffrey A. Weinman [Docket No. 173]. On May 29, 2015, defendants submitted counter-designations to plaintiffs' counter-designations for the May 15 and 16, 2014 deposition of Robert Sutton and the January 3, 2007 and July 17, 2012 de
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Objections to Defendants' Counter-Designations to Plaintiffs' Counter-Designations for Robert Sutton and Roland Anderson filed by plaintiffs Centrix Financial Liquidating Trust and Jeffrey A. Weinman [Docket No. 173]. On May 29, 2015, defendants submitted counter-designations to plaintiffs' counter-designations for the May 15 and 16, 2014 deposition of Robert Sutton and the January 3, 2007 and July 17, 2012 dep..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Objections to Defendants' Counter-Designations to Plaintiffs' Counter-Designations for Robert Sutton and Roland Anderson filed by plaintiffs Centrix Financial Liquidating Trust and Jeffrey A. Weinman [Docket No. 173]. On May 29, 2015, defendants submitted counter-designations to plaintiffs' counter-designations for the May 15 and 16, 2014 deposition of Robert Sutton and the January 3, 2007 and July 17, 2012 depositions of Roland Anderson. See Docket No. 165. Plaintiffs object to defendants' counter-designations as not being permitted by the Court's practice standards or the local rules of this district.
Because the Court's practice standards do not permit counter-counter-designations, see Practice Standards (Civil cases), Judge Philip A. Brimmer, §§ II.E.3, F.3, plaintiffs' objection [Docket No. 173] is SUSTAINED.
Source: Leagle
