Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GPNE CORP. v. APPLE INC., 5:12-cv-02885-LHK (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130507854 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 06, 2013
Latest Update: May 06, 2013
Summary: AGREED TO MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR GPNE CORP. TO SUBMIT MARKMAN REPLY BRIEF LUCY H. KOH, District Judge. AGREED TO MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR GPNE CORP. TO SUBMIT MARKMAN REPLY BRIEF FROM AY 6 TO MAY 10 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff GPNE Corp. ("GPNE") and Defendants Apple, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., Pantech Co., Ltd. and Pantech Wireless, Inc. ("Defendants"), defendants in the above-captioned related
More

AGREED TO MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR GPNE CORP. TO SUBMIT MARKMAN REPLY BRIEF

LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.

AGREED TO MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR GPNE CORP. TO SUBMIT MARKMAN REPLY BRIEF FROM AY 6 TO MAY 10

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff GPNE Corp. ("GPNE") and Defendants Apple, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., Pantech Co., Ltd. and Pantech Wireless, Inc. ("Defendants"), defendants in the above-captioned related actions pending in this District, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for GPNE to submit its Markman Reply Brief from May 6, 2013 to May 10, 2013.

1. On February 20, 2013, a Minute Order and Case Management Order was filed by this Court [Dkt. No. 63] for Claim Construction Replies to be filed by May 6, 2013.

2. The parties have agreed to extend the time that GPNE will file its Markman Reply Brief to May 10, 2013.

5. No previous extensions of time have been requested or granted with respect to the Motion to Extend Time to Submit Markman Briefs; and

6. This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between GPNE and Defendants that GPNE will have until May 10, 2013, to submit its Markman Reply Brief.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore;

IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer