Filed: Apr. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this ____ day of April 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc. 174), Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or, in the Alternative, New Trial (Docs. 187, 188), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 199), Defendant's Reply (Doc. 201), Plaintiff's Sur-Reply (Doc. 204), and all accompanying briefs and relevant correspondence, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. Defenda
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge. AND NOW, this ____ day of April 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc. 174), Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or, in the Alternative, New Trial (Docs. 187, 188), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 199), Defendant's Reply (Doc. 201), Plaintiff's Sur-Reply (Doc. 204), and all accompanying briefs and relevant correspondence, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. Defendan..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this ____ day of April 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc. 174), Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or, in the Alternative, New Trial (Docs. 187, 188), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 199), Defendant's Reply (Doc. 201), Plaintiff's Sur-Reply (Doc. 204), and all accompanying briefs and relevant correspondence, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
1. Defendant's initial Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc. 174) is DENIED AS MOOT, and
2. Defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docs. 187, 188) is GRANTED.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be closed for statistical purposes.
