United States v. Safehouse, 19-0519. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191003e79
Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 2nd day of October, 2019, upon consideration of the Government's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 47), and Safehouse's response, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED . Accepting the facts in the pleadings as true, as required under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 U.S.C. 856 (a)(2) would not prohibit Safehouse from establishing and operating an overdose prevention facility that provides medica
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 2nd day of October, 2019, upon consideration of the Government's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 47), and Safehouse's response, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED . Accepting the facts in the pleadings as true, as required under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 U.S.C. 856 (a)(2) would not prohibit Safehouse from establishing and operating an overdose prevention facility that provides medical..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 2nd day of October, 2019, upon consideration of the Government's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 47), and Safehouse's response, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Accepting the facts in the pleadings as true, as required under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(2) would not prohibit Safehouse from establishing and operating an overdose prevention facility that provides medically supervised consumption services.
Source: Leagle
