Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NANNEGARI v. MOORE LAW GROUP, 3:16-cv-6060-MMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170110689 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . COME NOW Plaintiff ROHIT NANNEGARI and Defendant THE MOORE LAW GROUP, A PROF. CORP., by and through the undersigned counsel of record, and file this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(2). It is agreed that each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, J. Erik Heath, attest that con
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

COME NOW Plaintiff ROHIT NANNEGARI and Defendant THE MOORE LAW GROUP, A PROF. CORP., by and through the undersigned counsel of record, and file this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(2). It is agreed that each party will bear its own costs and attorney's fees.

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, J. Erik Heath, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 9th day of January, 2017, at San Francisco.

ORDER

Having read the foregoing stipulation and agreement of the parties, and for good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT,

The above action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney's fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer