Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JONES v. ConAGRA FOODS, INC., 12-cv-1633-CRB. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130710767 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiffs and Defendant ConAgra Foods, Inc. ("ConAgra"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below: 1. Pursuant to the Court's April 29, 2013 Order granting the parties' stipulation regarding scheduling (Dkt. 104), Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due July 8, 2013, any op
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING NEW BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and Defendant ConAgra Foods, Inc. ("ConAgra"), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation, based upon the recitals below:

1. Pursuant to the Court's April 29, 2013 Order granting the parties' stipulation regarding scheduling (Dkt. 104), Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due July 8, 2013, any opposition or response is due September 9, 2013, any reply is due September 23, 2013, and the Class Certification Hearing is set for October 18, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. 2. On July 2, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an Ex Parte Application To Modify Briefing Schedule On Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification (Dkt. 116) seeking to extend all deadlines relating to the class certification motion by 45 days so that Plaintiffs would have sufficient time to review and evaluate corrections to Stephanie Kensicki's testimony and determine how to respond. 3. In order to facilitate the parties' ability to reconvene Ms. Kensicki's deposition to address the corrections to her deposition testimony, if Plaintiffs desire, ConAgra has agreed to make Ms. Kensicki available promptly for a deposition (possibly via telephone) to address such corrections. 4. Counsel for the parties have conferred and agreed, subject to Court approval, to jointly propose that the briefing schedule be modified so that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due August 7, 2013, ConAgra's opposition is due October 9, 2013, and Plaintiffs' reply is due October 30, 2013. 5. The parties have agreed, subject to Court approval, to jointly propose that the hearing date for Plaintiffs' motion for class certification be rescheduled to November 15, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, and good cause appearing, the Court orders that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due August 7, 2013, ConAgra's opposition is due October 9, 2013, and Plaintiffs' reply is due October 30, 2013. The Court further orders that the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification shall be on November 15, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer