Sulyma v. Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee, 15-cv-04977 NC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160509795
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 06, 2016
Latest Update: May 06, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 94 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The parties have submitted separate proposed protective orders and now ask the Court to choose between them. Dkt. No. 94. The Court's view is that the proposed orders are similar, and it orders the parties to meet and confer to resolve the remaining issues. They must file a joint proposed protective order by May 13, 2016, or the Court will set the matter for a hearing on May 18, 2016. IT IS SO
Summary: ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 94 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . The parties have submitted separate proposed protective orders and now ask the Court to choose between them. Dkt. No. 94. The Court's view is that the proposed orders are similar, and it orders the parties to meet and confer to resolve the remaining issues. They must file a joint proposed protective order by May 13, 2016, or the Court will set the matter for a hearing on May 18, 2016. IT IS SO O..
More
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 94
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
The parties have submitted separate proposed protective orders and now ask the Court to choose between them. Dkt. No. 94. The Court's view is that the proposed orders are similar, and it orders the parties to meet and confer to resolve the remaining issues. They must file a joint proposed protective order by May 13, 2016, or the Court will set the matter for a hearing on May 18, 2016.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
