Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Evox Productions, LLC v. Chrome Data Solutions, LP, 3:16-cv-00057-JR. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20190801d49 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARCO A. HERNANDEZ , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings & Recommendation (#120) on June 26, 2019, in which she recommends the Court grant Plaintiff's motion to amend the Complaint. Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114 , 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d
More

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings & Recommendation (#120) on June 26, 2019, in which she recommends the Court grant Plaintiff's motion to amend the Complaint. Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings & Recommendation [120], and therefore, Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint [111] is granted. The amended complaint, along with a joint proposed case schedule setting forth the remaining case deadlines, shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer