Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McNamara v. Selling Source, LLC, 2:17-cv-02969-JAD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180706a06 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME LLC; TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS SELLING SOURCE, LLC, PARTNER WEEKLY L.L.C., MONEYMUTUAL, LLC, DATAX, LTD., AND DEREK LAFAVOR'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) ORDER JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff, Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff'') in his capacity as court-appointed Monitor, Defendants Selling Source, LLC; PartnerWeekly L.L.C.; MoneyMutual, LLC; and DataX, Ltd. ("Corporate Defendants") represented by Jeff Sil
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME LLC; TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS SELLING SOURCE, LLC, PARTNER WEEKLY L.L.C., MONEYMUTUAL, LLC, DATAX, LTD., AND DEREK LAFAVOR'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

ORDER

Plaintiff, Thomas W. McNamara ("Plaintiff'') in his capacity as court-appointed Monitor, Defendants Selling Source, LLC; PartnerWeekly L.L.C.; MoneyMutual, LLC; and DataX, Ltd. ("Corporate Defendants") represented by Jeff Silvestri of McDonald Carano, LLP and Benjamin J. Razi and Dennis B. Auerbach of Covington & Burling LLP, and Defendant Derek LaFavor ("LaFavor") represented by Marc P. Cook of Cook & Kelesis, Ltd. (collectively, "Defendants") stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint against Defendants on April 30, 2018 (ECF No. 49);

WHEREAS, Defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint on May 30, 2018 (ECF Nos. 52, 53 — the "Motions to Dismiss");

WHEREAS, to accommodate schedules, the parties filed a stipulation on June 7, 2018 (a) requesting an extension to June 29, 2018 of the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the Motions to Dismiss; and (b) requesting a corresponding extension to July 23, 2018 of the deadline for Defendants to file their reply briefs in support of the Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 54);

WHEREAS, the Court's order approving the stipulation (ECF No. 55) extended Plaintiff's response deadline to June 29, 2018 but did not address the parties' request to extend Defendants' reply deadline by a like amount of time to July 23, 2018;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his responses to the Motions to Dismiss on June 29, 2018 (ECF Nos. 58, 59);

WHEREAS, the parties agreed previously and continue to agree that Defendants should have until July 23, 2018 to file their reply briefs, giving each side an equivalent extension of time for their filings (taking account of the July 4 holiday);

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate, subject to Court approval, that Defendants' deadline to file their replies in support of the Motions to Dismiss shall be extended to July 23, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer