Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Approximately $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency, 15-MC-0104 KJM AC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160505851 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties have stipulated to extend time for filing a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency. ECF No. 11. Under 18 U.S.C. 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline fo
More

ORDER

The parties have stipulated to extend time for filing a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency. ECF No. 11.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause. United States v. Real Prop. Located at 475 Martin Lane, Beverly Hills, CA, 545 F.3d 1134, 1141 (9th Cir. 2008). In United States v. Real Prop., the court allowed the parties three extensions to file the complaint for forfeiture. Id. at 1147.

This is the parties' sixth stipulation to extend the deadline. While the court approves the stipulation, a future stipulated extension must be accompanied by a clear showing of good cause supported by a specific statement of reasons.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer