Love v. AFP Fifty Seven Corp., 19-cv-02206-SK. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191018951
Visitors: 59
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 17. SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff advises the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this case. (Dkt. 17.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shal
Summary: CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Regarding Docket No. 17. SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff advises the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this case. (Dkt. 17.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall..
More
CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL
Regarding Docket No. 17.
SALLIE KIM, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff advises the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this case. (Dkt. 17.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
