Johnson v. Executive Hotel Vintage Court, LLC, 18-cv-06248-JSC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190508b65
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 07, 2019
Latest Update: May 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . On February 1, 2019, the parties advised the Court that they had reached a settlement with the expectation that a dismissal would be filed following the Court's ruling on a motion for attorney's fees. As of March 14, 2019, no motion for attorney's fees had been filed. Accordingly, on that date the Court ordered that on or before April 4, 2019, Plaintiff must file a dismissal or a motion for a
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . On February 1, 2019, the parties advised the Court that they had reached a settlement with the expectation that a dismissal would be filed following the Court's ruling on a motion for attorney's fees. As of March 14, 2019, no motion for attorney's fees had been filed. Accordingly, on that date the Court ordered that on or before April 4, 2019, Plaintiff must file a dismissal or a motion for at..
More
ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 21
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
On February 1, 2019, the parties advised the Court that they had reached a settlement with the expectation that a dismissal would be filed following the Court's ruling on a motion for attorney's fees. As of March 14, 2019, no motion for attorney's fees had been filed. Accordingly, on that date the Court ordered that on or before April 4, 2019, Plaintiff must file a dismissal or a motion for attorney's fees and costs. April 4, 2019 came and went without Plaintiff filing anything on the docket. The Court therefore orders Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for a failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with the Court's order. Plaintiff must respond in writing on or before May 22, 2019. Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond by the deadline may result in dismissal of his lawsuit with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
