DAVIS v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, 2:11-cv-1027 TLN CKD P. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130531a60
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 29, 2013
Latest Update: May 29, 2013
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. By order filed April 16, 2013, the court directed plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on or before May 16, 2013. Plaintiff has not filed his pretrial statement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. By order filed April 16, 2013, the court directed plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on or before May 16, 2013. Plaintiff has not filed his pretrial statement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ..
More
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
By order filed April 16, 2013, the court directed plaintiff to file his pretrial statement on or before May 16, 2013. Plaintiff has not filed his pretrial statement. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Source: Leagle
