Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roque v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-00192-SKO. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170216871 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO AMEND APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. 2) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . ORDER Plaintiff Michelle L. Roque filed a complaint on February 10, 2017, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Docs. 1, 2.) Plaintiff's application fails to set forth a complete answer to question number 5 regarding the description and value of the "real, estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles or any
More

ORDER TO AMEND APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(Doc. 2)

ORDER

Plaintiff Michelle L. Roque filed a complaint on February 10, 2017, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Docs. 1, 2.) Plaintiff's application fails to set forth a complete answer to question number 5 regarding the description and value of the "real, estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles or any other thing of value" owned by Plaintiff. Therefore, the Court is unable to determine at this time whether Plaintiff is entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within 28 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis that fully responds to all applicable questions, including question number 5; and 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve Plaintiff with a copy of this order and a new in forma pauperis application form.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer