JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, D.G., a minor, by and through his guardian ad litem, Denise Bonilla; D.E.G., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, Denise Bonilla; G.D., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, Denise Bonilla; and Ramona Ramirez Nunez, (hereinafter collectively "Plaintiffs") are jointly represented by Matthew C. Clark and Neil K. Gehlawat of Chain-Cohn-Stiles, and Dale K. Galipo of the Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo.
Defendants, County of Kern (hereinafter "County") and Deputy Robert Reed (hereinafter "Reed"), (hereinafter collectively "Defendants") are represented by Andrew C. Thomson, Office of Kern County Counsel.
Plaintiffs and Defendants are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."
1. The Parties have repeatedly met and conferred regarding expert witness discovery matters in an effort to resolve expert discovery issues, including deposition scheduling.
2. Plaintiffs intend to take Dr. Mohandie's deposition on Friday, September 16, 2016. Defendants had noticed DeFoe's deposition for September 15, 2016, but DeFoe is scheduled to be in Atlanta, Georgia for expert testimony and is not scheduled to return to LAX until the late afternoon or early evening of Friday, September 16, 2016. The Parties have been able to schedule the deposition of all other expert witnesses within the initial deadline established by the Court.
4. Defendants properly noticed, and renoticed, the deposition of expert DeFoe, however as the result of DeFoe's expert witness and trial testimony obligations and a scheduled vacation, along with attorney schedule conflicts, his deposition cannot be completed prior to September 16, 2016.
5. In coordinating with the schedules of counsel, the Parties agree that counsel and DeFoe will be available for, and complete, his deposition on September 19, 2016.
6. Nothing in this stipulation constitutes a waiver of any Parties' right to challenge the designation of DeFoe as an expert or to move to exclude any and all testimony by DeFoe.
7. The Parties do not believe that the requested continuance of the deposition testimony of DeFoe will have any adverse impact on the Court's Scheduling Orders.
8. In light of the Parties willingness to meet and confer, and in the spirit collegiality and discovery, the Parties believe that good cause for the continuance has been shown.
9. The Parties respectfully request the Court's consideration of this request.
The deposition of Plaintiffs' expert Scott DeFoe may be noticed for, and taken on, a date which is later than the September 16, 2016 scheduled conclusion of expert witness discovery, but will be concluded on or before September 19, 2016.
Good cause appearing, the STIPULATION TO ALLOW DEPOSITION OF EXPERT SCOTT DEFOE BEYOND EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE DUE TO UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES AND SCHEDULING ISSUES in CASE NO. 1:15-CV-00760 JAM-JLT is hereby approved and adopted as the order of this Court.