HEIFETZ v. CHABRA, 15-cv-05512-JSC. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160609a16
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF FOR STATUS UPDATE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed this ADA access case on December 2, 2015. Defendant William Ku has been served and appeared, but the docket does not reflect that the other two defendants, Inder Chabra and Krishna Chabra, have been served. According to the Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 4), Plaintiff was to have filed a "Notice of Need for Mediation" on or before May 1, 2016. According to the docket, no activity has occurred since De
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF FOR STATUS UPDATE JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed this ADA access case on December 2, 2015. Defendant William Ku has been served and appeared, but the docket does not reflect that the other two defendants, Inder Chabra and Krishna Chabra, have been served. According to the Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 4), Plaintiff was to have filed a "Notice of Need for Mediation" on or before May 1, 2016. According to the docket, no activity has occurred since Dec..
More
ORDER TO PLAINTIFF FOR STATUS UPDATE
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed this ADA access case on December 2, 2015. Defendant William Ku has been served and appeared, but the docket does not reflect that the other two defendants, Inder Chabra and Krishna Chabra, have been served. According to the Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 4), Plaintiff was to have filed a "Notice of Need for Mediation" on or before May 1, 2016. According to the docket, no activity has occurred since December 31, 2015. Accordingly, on or before June 21, 2016, Plaintiff shall file a written status update with the Court. The update should explain whether the Chabra defendants have been served and, if not, why they should not be dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
