Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on April 21, 2017. 2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until May 19, 2017, and to exclude time between April 21, 2017 and May 19, 2017, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the followi
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on April 21, 2017. 2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until May 19, 2017, and to exclude time between April 21, 2017 and May 19, 2017, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the followin..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.
STIPULATION
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on April 21, 2017.
2. By this stipulation, defendants now move to continue the status conference until May 19, 2017, and to exclude time between April 21, 2017 and May 19, 2017, under Local Code T4.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a. The government produced discovery associated with this case. The government has also made physical evidence available for review.
b. Counsel for the defendants are still reviewing discovery, meeting with respective clients, investigating information and negotiating various possible resolutions in this case..
c. Counsel for defendants believe that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d. The government does not object to the continuance.
e. Based upon the above-stated facts, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of April 21, 2017, 2016, to May 19, 2017, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv), Local Code T4, because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendants' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provision of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
