Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Budge v. Saul, 2:19-cv-01804-RFB-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20191029l89 Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff Sydney Budge has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 1), and submitted a Complaint (Docket No. 1-1). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis states both that she has $3,233.19 in her checking account and that the amount in her checking account as of October 7, 2019, six days after Plaintiff signed the application, is $1,000. Docket No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff
More

ORDER

I. DISCUSSION

Plaintiff Sydney Budge has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 1), and submitted a Complaint (Docket No. 1-1).

Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis states both that she has $3,233.19 in her checking account and that the amount in her checking account as of October 7, 2019, six days after Plaintiff signed the application, is $1,000. Docket No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff fails to explain why the balance in her checking account decreased so significantly in a six-day period.

In signing her application, Plaintiff acknowledged that presenting a false statement in the application may result in a dismissal of her claims. Docket No. 1 at 1. See also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A) (The Court "shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that ... the allegation of poverty is untrue"). Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application is denied without prejudice so that she may adequately explain the discrepancy with her bank account and present records to support her explanation.

The Court will retain Plaintiff's complaint, Docket No. 1-1, but will not file it until the matter of the payment of the filing fee is resolved. Plaintiff will be granted an opportunity to cure the deficiencies of her application to proceed in forma pauperis, or in the alternative, pay the full filing fee for this action. If Plaintiff chooses to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis she must file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis with the supporting documents.

II. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Docket No. 1, is DENIED without prejudice to file a new application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than November 15, 2019, Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in forma pauperis; or (2) pay the full $400 fee for filing a civil action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, dismissal of this action may result.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall retain the complaint, Docket No. 1-1, but shall not file it at this time.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer